Author Topic: Stocking Screens and Permanent Hardener  (Read 4907 times)

Offline lancasterprinthouse

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
Re: Stocking Screens and Permanent Hardener
« Reply #15 on: February 08, 2020, 04:15:31 PM »
We have a number of jobs that seem like we print almost weekly. Some of them high color count, and during tours,
constantly rotating.

We've never stocked screens because in my early days as a press op re-using "old" screens always grossed me out. But now I'm seeing
the amount of effort going into making new ones for every run and it seems a bit much.

I'm considering one of two options:

1. Store screens exactly as they come off press, IE leave taped but pull majority of ink. Our reg system is good enough
that if we paid extra attention (or even stored readouts and used same heads) we could just reload and go. Most labor
saving/economical option but also least cleanly.

2. Pull ink/tape and wipe down with press wash. This is probably what we'll end up doing, seems like a good tradeoff between the above
and re-making entirely new.


One concern I have is emulsion breakdown. We use bulletproof SP-1400 and expose it on 8k MH so the dudes are tough, but constantly
printing/cleaning/printing/cleaning is going to wear anyone down. Would permanent hardener help in this situation? I've never used it.
We use roller frames exclusively so re-meshing when she's done for isn't that big of an issue.

This may be a dumb question but I’ve never had MH as I went straight from home built to LED. Are the only 8k units made in a vertical format or are there some made in a format similar to the 3140?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Offline lancasterprinthouse

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
Re: Stocking Screens and Permanent Hardener
« Reply #16 on: February 08, 2020, 04:23:06 PM »
We have a number of jobs that seem like we print almost weekly. Some of them high color count, and during tours,
constantly rotating.

We've never stocked screens because in my early days as a press op re-using "old" screens always grossed me out. But now I'm seeing
the amount of effort going into making new ones for every run and it seems a bit much.

I'm considering one of two options:

1. Store screens exactly as they come off press, IE leave taped but pull majority of ink. Our reg system is good enough
that if we paid extra attention (or even stored readouts and used same heads) we could just reload and go. Most labor
saving/economical option but also least cleanly.

2. Pull ink/tape and wipe down with press wash. This is probably what we'll end up doing, seems like a good tradeoff between the above
and re-making entirely new.


One concern I have is emulsion breakdown. We use bulletproof SP-1400 and expose it on 8k MH so the dudes are tough, but constantly
printing/cleaning/printing/cleaning is going to wear anyone down. Would permanent hardener help in this situation? I've never used it.
We use roller frames exclusively so re-meshing when she's done for isn't that big of an issue.

This may be a dumb question but I’ve never had MH as I went straight from home built to LED. Are the only 8k units made in a vertical format or are there some made in a format similar to the 3140?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline ebscreen

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4243
Re: Stocking Screens and Permanent Hardener
« Reply #17 on: February 10, 2020, 11:55:55 AM »
Ours is a horizontal standalone unit. We can burn 23x31's 3 up.
With all the variables in what we do it's nice to essentially completely eliminate at least that one.

Offline lancasterprinthouse

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
Re: Stocking Screens and Permanent Hardener
« Reply #18 on: February 10, 2020, 09:09:03 PM »
Ours is a horizontal standalone unit. We can burn 23x31's 3 up.
With all the variables in what we do it's nice to essentially completely eliminate at least that one.
Mind me asking what unit you have?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline bimmridder

  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1854
Re: Stocking Screens and Permanent Hardener
« Reply #19 on: February 10, 2020, 09:38:37 PM »
You can get about anything you want. I had a 5K, wanted an 8K. My vacuum table (pre CTS would image 5 23x31 frames at once.
Barth Gimble

Printing  (not well) for 35 years. Strong in licensed sports apparel. Plastisol printer. Located in Cedar Rapids, IA

Offline ebscreen

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4243
Re: Stocking Screens and Permanent Hardener
« Reply #20 on: February 11, 2020, 10:52:56 AM »
Mind me asking what unit you have?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Richland or something, it's not mass produced at any rate. Well made, kinda tall, has a
beast of a vacuum pump.

The light itself is an Olec AL-83, but more importantly it has the external cooling option.
Literal powered vents up and out the ceiling. Heats effect on electronics is frequently ignored
by manufacturers, IE the two $400 chokes we had to replace on our 3140.

Offline ZooCity

  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4914
Re: Stocking Screens and Permanent Hardener
« Reply #21 on: February 13, 2020, 06:55:15 PM »
2 part hardener will absolutely get you there, screens will typically break before the emulsion does in that case.   1 part may do it (yes HCL for the 1 part I believe) as well.  As mentioned, you probably don't need either.   We only use 2 part for ultra long jobs where we have multiple sets of hardened screens due to the size and turnaround needed.

If we were doing it we'd clean off the ink. 

More importantly, get ye workflow tuned up for this.  Who makes the call to save a job?  How does staff know it's saved/archived?  How do they know which screens are stabilized enough to be used for saving a job.  Do your films line up all the time when a single color needs reprinted or are you saving films with the screens... 

If I tried this at my shop I'm pretty sure I know how I'd do it and I think it would look a lot like saving reference prints, which doesn't always look too good around here.  You'll probably find your palm on your forehead a little more than usual in the first few weeks while screens are being shot that were available from the archive, non work-hardened screens are getting sent to permanent, re-shoot of one color from the 9 color job doesn't line up the rest, gotta teardown, burn again, reset, etc.  More variables to this than it seems on the surface! Simple, sensible concept with a lot of workflow items needed to support it and actually make it outperform burning fresh screens.

Good for morale though if heavy rotation jobs are getting reshot on the weekly, nobody likes shooting the same job over an over- feels weird.


Offline ebscreen

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4243
Re: Stocking Screens and Permanent Hardener
« Reply #22 on: February 14, 2020, 05:45:31 PM »
It's funny that in 15 years I've never dabbled with permanent screens.

What brought this all to mind was seeing new/used screens of the same design crossing paths
in the screen room. Didn't seem right. Disapproving grunts from the darkroom confirmed it.

Luckily we can easily flag jobs by art code in our system. Have it notify us, or even completely
skip the pre-press section after mockup approval. That's precisely the kind of logistics I had in mind
when writing our db all those years ago.

That said......

We saved a set for one of the biggest offender jobs last week.
I saw them on the pallet rack.
They looked dingy and well, used.
I put them back in circulation.


Back to the drawing board.


Offline ZooCity

  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4914
Re: Stocking Screens and Permanent Hardener
« Reply #23 on: February 14, 2020, 05:48:17 PM »
Quote
skip the pre-press section after mockup approval.

This is the way!  Yer lucky to have a system that can do this.  It should be a "pull from inventory" for the screen/pre press dept, just as it would be if you were pulling shirts from your own stock for an order.

Offline ebscreen

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4243
Re: Stocking Screens and Permanent Hardener
« Reply #24 on: February 14, 2020, 06:48:26 PM »
My one concern would be new date backs etc. I have nightmares of printing the wrong dates.
And it has never happened. Yet.