Author Topic: Starlight LED exposure unit SOLD!  (Read 7348 times)

Offline GraphicDisorder

  • !!!
  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 5854
  • Bottom Feeder
Re: Starlight LED exposure unit, Tri-Loc 23X31
« Reply #15 on: January 22, 2015, 10:44:14 AM »
Well that solves that.  Still glad we went larger, we do 25x36's on ours as well.  Doubt that would fit. 
Brandt | Graphic Disorder | www.GraphicDisorder.com
@GraphicDisorder - Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Youtube


Offline 244

  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1368
Re: Starlight LED exposure unit, Tri-Loc 23X31
« Reply #16 on: January 22, 2015, 11:00:14 AM »
Here's ours.
You will eventually wear out your blanket and or break the glass. We do not recommend using the tri-loc on the smaller version for those reasons. Yes you can physically put the frame on the glass but in the near future you will pay the price. Just a FYI.
Rich Hoffman

Offline 244

  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1368
Re: Starlight LED exposure unit, Tri-Loc 23X31
« Reply #17 on: January 22, 2015, 11:01:23 AM »
Upsell busted!
What will be busted is not an upsell. Stay tuned!
Rich Hoffman

Offline Gilligan

  • !!!
  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 6853
Re: Starlight LED exposure unit, Tri-Loc 23X31
« Reply #18 on: January 22, 2015, 11:13:01 AM »
Why wasn't the unit made a hair bigger to be able to accommodate your mainstay product on properly sized screens for the exposure unit?

They don't need LED's under their trilock... so people with trilocks are forced to buy more LED's than they need. :(

Offline sqslabs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 972
  • Work hardened.
Re: Starlight LED exposure unit, Tri-Loc 23X31
« Reply #19 on: January 22, 2015, 11:35:01 AM »
What will be busted is not an upsell. Stay tuned!

Upsell un-busted!
Brett
Squeegee Science
Fort Lauderdale, FL

Offline 244

  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1368
Re: Starlight LED exposure unit, Tri-Loc 23X31
« Reply #20 on: January 22, 2015, 12:15:15 PM »
Why wasn't the unit made a hair bigger to be able to accommodate your mainstay product on properly sized screens for the exposure unit?

They don't need LED's under their trilock... so people with trilocks are forced to buy more LED's than they need. :(
Price dictates the size as well as matching what was already a standard size for smaller screens. There are orher sizes other than what is used here.
Rich Hoffman

Offline Gilligan

  • !!!
  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 6853
Re: Starlight LED exposure unit, Tri-Loc 23X31
« Reply #21 on: January 22, 2015, 12:28:29 PM »
I guess... I just don't see a bit more metal, glass and neoprene being that much more expensive to make it where it was compatible with your trilock for the size screen that is in the name of the unit.

Offline 244

  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1368
Re: Starlight LED exposure unit, Tri-Loc 23X31
« Reply #22 on: January 22, 2015, 12:39:45 PM »
I guess... I just don't see a bit more metal, glass and neoprene being that much more expensive to make it where it was compatible with your trilock for the size screen that is in the name of the unit.
I would not expect you to know the cost associated with "little changes" here.
Rich Hoffman

Offline Gilligan

  • !!!
  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 6853
Re: Starlight LED exposure unit, Tri-Loc 23X31
« Reply #23 on: January 22, 2015, 02:57:14 PM »
LOL... I love the subtle punches that you don't hold back on Rich.

Offline sweetts

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1768
  • Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication DUH
Re: Starlight LED exposure unit, Tri-Loc 23X31
« Reply #24 on: January 22, 2015, 03:17:15 PM »
This post has me laughing. Shoes don't come with load ratings but you just don't stick a 400lb lady in stilettos, she might squeeze into them but........ 
RT Screen Designs
Willowick Ohio
www.rtscreendesigns.com

Offline inkman996

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3760
Re: Starlight LED exposure unit, Tri-Loc 23X31
« Reply #25 on: January 22, 2015, 03:27:06 PM »
This post has me laughing. Shoes don't come with load ratings but you just don't stick a 400lb lady in stilettos, she might squeeze into them but........

I think there is a flavor of porn for that, if not you should start filming and become a millionaire overnight.

"No man is an island"

Offline sweetts

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1768
  • Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication DUH
Re: Starlight LED exposure unit, Tri-Loc 23X31
« Reply #26 on: January 22, 2015, 03:48:47 PM »
Bow chica wow wow,,, thud
RT Screen Designs
Willowick Ohio
www.rtscreendesigns.com

Offline kingscreen

  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1161
Re: Starlight LED exposure unit, Tri-Loc 23X31
« Reply #27 on: January 22, 2015, 03:56:40 PM »
I'll keep everyone posted on how long it takes before we need a blanket or glass replaced.  Market research hard at work.  ;)
Scott Garnett
King Screen

Offline Mr Tees!!

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 661
Re: Starlight LED exposure unit, Tri-Loc 23X31
« Reply #28 on: January 22, 2015, 04:17:46 PM »
USER TIP: the blankets on these are very flexy and supple, which lends itself to the fast draw-down times these units exhibit. The downside to this is that the blanket can develop holes in high-wear points, like mine did where the blanket overlays the inside corner of the frame.
   After some trial and error, I stumbled upon SHOE-GOO, and it worked great! After a few failed attempts at devising a patch that was flexible enough, I realized that any patch at all was unnecessary. Simply coat the area in question in a thick, liberal amount, and let cure overnight.
   I applied some to all possible wear areas (topside of blanket) as a reinforcement to avoid future hole. If you have already worn a hole, or are pretty close, applying to both inside and outside of the blanket may be necessary. But it works quite nicely!!!!
Thanks TSB gang!!

...Sean, Mr Tees!!!

Online ebscreen

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4245
Re: Starlight LED exposure unit, Tri-Loc 23X31
« Reply #29 on: January 22, 2015, 04:48:44 PM »
WTF it's like the discussion point of the other thread played out in it's entirety here.