Author Topic: Theoretical Ink Volume vs real world PFP vs single vs double no flash  (Read 3362 times)

Offline Gilligan

  • !!!
  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 6853
So... 135s has a 43 cm2 per m2 and 180 is 33.

So does PFP lay down essentially DOUBLE that?  Obviosly double stroking no flash doesn't.

We are just toying with the idea of a one hit on a 135 vs pfp a 180... but if we are wrong on the 135 then we either reburn or double stroke the 135.

Just trying to figure out which will lay down the least as it will be a large square of ink. :(


Offline Admiral

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 858
Re: Theoretical Ink Volume vs real world PFP vs single vs double no flash
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2022, 03:21:57 PM »
I have found that the second hit lays down less than the first hit.  We don't really 1 hit any whites though so if I wanted less ink than normal, I would just go one mesh count higher.