TSB

screen printing => Screen Making => Topic started by: Homer on October 18, 2012, 03:28:46 PM

Title: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: Homer on October 18, 2012, 03:28:46 PM
 should I go 305 or 355? I have 305's here but I'm wondering if I should get something higher. What LPI should I go to? I have never done this successfully and I got 2 jobs next week, popping the ol' cherry on this stuff. Thanks! J
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: LuxInks on October 18, 2012, 03:32:08 PM
Hey,
We usually use 355's, but 305's should work just fine for you. Good tension is the key really. We typically do 65lpi round dot at 22.5 angel for all colors. In the past, we have also used 55lpi no worries.
Post up a pic when you get them done, let us check them out.
Good luck.
Paul
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: LuxInks on October 18, 2012, 03:33:14 PM
"Eliptical" dot...I stand corrected ha!
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: blue moon on October 18, 2012, 03:55:05 PM
305 is fine. I would stick with 55lpi. with good seps it should not be a big deal . . . Call me if you get stuck somewhere.

pierre
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: Homer on October 18, 2012, 04:13:19 PM
Thanks guys, I'll go 305 and see what happens. Coudray is doing the seps for us so I know we'll be set there, I'm just nervous about this. I have 2 designs to do, one is a photo of a girl that passed, so I gotta pull this off -no choice. . .
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: ScreenFoo on October 18, 2012, 04:29:28 PM
I've only done a couple, but gotten decent results with 305 and a 55LPI elliptical dot, and that's with so-so pre-press gear and crappy seps by yours truly.  I bet it'll turn out great.

DC underbase?

Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: Sbrem on October 18, 2012, 04:44:14 PM
Films from Mr. Coudray will indeed be spot on. We also like 55 LPI on 305's, though in the early days of just CMYK on white we would go with
355's and 65 line.

Steve
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: Dottonedan on October 18, 2012, 05:09:57 PM

Yea,  I guess that Coudrey guy is ok... :-[    I guess. :'(

Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: Sbrem on October 18, 2012, 05:22:57 PM

Yea,  I guess that Coudrey guy is ok... :-[    I guess. :'(

I bought a copy of Control Without Confusion (Joe Clarke w/Mark Coudray) and it came with the actual Nocona Boots t-shirt that was featured in the book, and all I could think was, "How the F did they do this?" It may be 20+ years old, but it's still a great book.

Steve

I also realized that I didn't know Jack compared to what could be done, hell, we were still stapling mesh to wood frames.
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: Dottonedan on October 18, 2012, 05:57:03 PM

Yea,  I guess that Coudrey guy is ok... :-[    I guess. :'(

I bought a copy of Control Without Confusion (Joe Clarke w/Mark Coudray) and it came with the actual Nocona Boots t-shirt that was featured in the book, and all I could think was, "How the F did they do this?" It may be 20+ years old, but it's still a great book.

Steve

I also realized that I didn't know Jack compared to what could be done, hell, we were still stapling mesh to wood frames.


Yes, anyone attempting to reach the best prints they can get has come across that book. Good stuff. Prob. one of THE best screen print books. I read it but it was a friends at the time and never actually bought one.  The print you refer to was posted on facebook again by Mark just about a year or so ago. Still an amazing print by even todays standards.



Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: Homer on October 18, 2012, 07:09:08 PM
what do you guys think for squeegies, go to a softer 60 duro? I have to do kelly green and purple shirts, can't discharge either color unfortunatly. I'm using union process inks. i've heard of the triple strength inks, but is it ok to add a few grams of standard plastisol to brighten it up if they are muted?
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: ScreenFoo on October 18, 2012, 08:08:38 PM
I wouldn't screw with modifying, I WOULD ABSOLUTELY get the 3X Union stuff--I did some R&D with the regular stuff on white underbases, and it was pretty disappointing.   

From what I've done on darks, the only issue I ran into was having to double stroke the CMYK part to clear--it was difficult to get the colors to clear because of the 'topography' of the underbase.  You may be lucky enough to be using a *good* shirt for this type of print, and have less of an issue with it.  I get stuck with 2000's and 5000's a lot.   >:(
I don't have a full set of 60's for the auto, used 70/90/70 triples all around.  May help with the dot piling...


I'm jealous Steve, I wish I had the shirt.   I'd say Control Without Confusion *is* the best book on screen printing available.   Certainly be interested in any suggestions on one that's better...
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: blue moon on October 19, 2012, 08:51:11 AM
so far the best book I have seen too! It is a little dated, but the principles are pretty solid.

as far as squeegees, the harder the better. We used to use 80's but are starting with 75's now (65/90/75). If we need more coverage, we turn the blade around for the softer duro.

not sure about the modification, if you are going to, add fluorescent inks to it rather than regular colors. I have some 3X quarts here, but never got around opening them. Regular stuff seems to work and we are familiar with it. we'll get to the other stuff one day.

pierre
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: tonypep on October 19, 2012, 09:18:33 AM
Adding flourescent inks to process inks is an old trick but can occaisonally cause problems due to the fact the pigments are not gound as fine and can result in loss of detail, espeically with 355 mesh.
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: Dottonedan on October 19, 2012, 09:51:57 AM
Good point Tony.  That reminds me of another thing I read. These are the tiny details of printing great CMYK.  I read years back that the ink particles of either Yellows or Cyans or both, are oblong shaped due to chemical makeup of certain minerals used to make the colors. As a result, 


As they are pushed through the tiny holes of a highlight area, (especially in 355,) these particles can lock into each other more so than other inks, thus clogging. This can be why some prints have screens that look great while one color Yellow or Cyan) will have detail loss in the highlight areas and shadow area.


A way to avoid that is to look at % of pen area on your mesh. Pierre uses 330's and they seem to provide the right amount of coverage and detail at the same time.


Just another tid bit.
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: tonypep on October 19, 2012, 10:25:08 AM
Forgot to mention that Union Tru-tones are SWOP compliant, most other brands are not. In my opinion they yield the "truest" results.
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: 3Deep on October 19, 2012, 12:31:50 PM
Homer post pics, Ifind the hardest thing for me in printing cymk is burning that dam yellow screen I always end up doing two screens, but I have found that burning yellow mesh hold more detail and yields a better exposure.

Darryl
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: Homer on October 19, 2012, 12:50:07 PM
got the seps back last night for the first order, they decided to go sim on it -but the second one is an actual pic of a person, so i really think 4cp is the only way for me to pull this off. . . .on purple shirts too, black would be better I think but not my call. .

I still don't see how this other one is going to work with the seps I got but who the hell am I to judge. . .films are printing right now. . . .

I think I'll leave the inks alone that I have, worse case I'll snag some XXX and roll with those.
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: Sbrem on October 19, 2012, 03:42:18 PM
Homer post pics, Ifind the hardest thing for me in printing cymk is burning that dam yellow screen I always end up doing two screens, but I have found that burning yellow mesh hold more detail and yields a better exposure.

Darryl

Always better to use yellow, if not orange for those fine halftones. White mesh lets the light scatter and overexpose your dots, yellow filters out the blue in the light so you get less of that. I even remember reading of some folks using red mesh...

Steve
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: alan802 on October 19, 2012, 04:12:57 PM
Undyed Clear or white mesh should not be used for halftone printing, well, fine halftones at least.  The list of colors and their ability to hold detail goes as follows:

White-low detail, bold block prints
Yellow-good detail
Orange-Fine detail
Red-Finest detail, for example, baloon printing
Black- Highest resolution possible

I've never seen red or black mesh.  Has anyone else?  We had some very high mesh in here years ago and it was all orange, 355-420 counts.  Before I knew any better, I tried printing a few jobs through those mesh counts and things didn't turn out well.  Inks don't travel well through those counts, plastisol at least.
Title: Re: CMYK on darks 305 or 355?
Post by: Homer on October 19, 2012, 06:37:15 PM
I've had orange and red mesh before, about 12 years ago, nobody sells it now. . although, I was reading my valley Litho catalog like I usually do on a friday night and I noticed they had orange.....

we just switched over to 70/90/70 on most of the squeegies and holy smokes, dot gain = gone compared to our 60/90/60, we'll be printing this sucker up on monday.