TSB

screen printing => Separations => Topic started by: Dottonedan on July 12, 2011, 09:12:15 PM

Title: Printing films POLL
Post by: Dottonedan on July 12, 2011, 09:12:15 PM
What are you using to print for films out?

You have two (2) votes. One for rare occasions and one for every day use.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Big Frank Sports on July 12, 2011, 09:28:28 PM
Im using an Epson Stylus Photo R2400 for my films.  SOB eats ink like crazy!

Frank
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: blue moon on July 12, 2011, 09:35:54 PM
inkjet
EPSON 3000 for everyday film, EPSON 1400 as backup and color stuff.

pierre
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Fresh Baked Printing on July 12, 2011, 11:50:10 PM
Epson 3000. OEM inks. Non-wp film.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: txscreener on July 12, 2011, 11:53:36 PM
Had to go with other.. We use an Oyo....
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: JBLUE on July 12, 2011, 11:54:48 PM
Epson 4000 and a 1400 for backup.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: jsheridan on July 13, 2011, 12:28:26 AM
R1800 w/all black until I can afford my 4880
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: JBLUE on July 13, 2011, 12:45:18 AM
John. Check craigslist in your area. I saw a used 4000 that was barely used for around 500.00.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: jason-23 on July 13, 2011, 12:58:12 AM
A 1400 here, the 3000 is in the garage doing nothing after it just screwed up. I wish I knew which printer prints as big as the 3000 with no hassles that I get from my 1400.....
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Frog on July 13, 2011, 12:58:49 AM
Had to go with other.. We use an Oyo....

You get to change your vote to Low End image setters, as I replaced Dan's Eyo with your machine, lol!
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: jsheridan on July 13, 2011, 02:30:36 AM
John. Check craigslist in your area. I saw a used 4000 that was barely used for around 500.00.


The printers are cheap.. it's the RIP, ink and media that kills it. 500 for the printer, 1500 for the consumables.

I don't need the 17" width right now and the r1800 is more than capable of producing fine detailed films.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Denis Kolar on July 13, 2011, 07:24:43 AM
Epson 1100, Fixxons and Phothoshop for halftones. My next purchase will be RIP, it looks like FM.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: alan802 on July 13, 2011, 08:56:35 AM
4800 with an 1800 as backup, accurip.  This has served us very well but I can't wait to move into the DTS realm.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: RICK STEFANICK on July 13, 2011, 09:19:15 AM
epson r1800 w/screeners choice rip and a  xante screenwriter 4
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Homer on July 13, 2011, 10:15:39 AM
2  Epson 1400's, accurip and bulk ink systems. Next is a nice reg system.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: 3Deep on July 13, 2011, 10:55:47 AM
2 epson 3000's using an old cadlink rip photoscript 7
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: jsheridan on July 13, 2011, 11:55:53 AM
2  Epson 1400's, accurip and bulk ink systems.

Hows the bulk working for you? I see them all over the place for the 14's and 18's and given the size of the stock cart, continuous systems look like a viable way to save time and $$ with ink.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Denis Kolar on July 13, 2011, 12:24:35 PM
I have cheap CIS from eBay, no Issues so far on Epson 1100. I think I paid $50 for filled system and refill kit is only $20 for all 5 colors. I went with dye ink, not the pigment iks that came with the printer.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: ebscreen on July 13, 2011, 12:25:20 PM
Epson 9000 every day, 3000 if that (god forbid) ever goes down.

Old ass Varityper wet-film imagesetter for whenever I think the effort
(cutting, darkroom processor, chemicals) is worth it. It's from the 80's,
I bought 2 for a dollar, and the film it produces is outstanding.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: DraginInk on July 13, 2011, 12:57:52 PM
Epson 4800 w 4 blacks 220 carts, QuickRIP, MaxBlack wp, everyday.

Epson 4000 in the corner waiting for print head repairs/replacement or DTG conversion .... some day ::).
Epson 3000 collecting dust... I must be holding on to it for SOME reason.

Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: mk162 on July 13, 2011, 01:01:01 PM
Epson 3000, CIS ink system for black only.  Plus a backup that I use for printing job tickets.  That one has 4 color CIS and runs OK. 
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Homer on July 13, 2011, 01:36:25 PM
2  Epson 1400's, accurip and bulk ink systems.


Hows the bulk working for you? I see them all over the place for the 14's and 18's and given the size of the stock cart, continuous systems look like a viable way to save time and $$ with ink.


Fantastic. i have 2 different systems, I have one of these sitting on standby:
http://cgi.ebay.com/Compatible-Bulk-Ink-CISS-CIS-Epson-1400-1410-1390-/400178791826?pt=BI_Toner&hash=item5d2c83c592 (http://cgi.ebay.com/Compatible-Bulk-Ink-CISS-CIS-Epson-1400-1410-1390-/400178791826?pt=BI_Toner&hash=item5d2c83c592)

 both printers have these installed right now. I like these way better than having hoses all over the place.

http://cgi.ebay.com/Refillable-ink-cartridge-EPSON-Stylus-Photo-1400-79-/370478404439?pt=AU_Computers_Printer_Accessories&hash=item56423bd357 (http://cgi.ebay.com/Refillable-ink-cartridge-EPSON-Stylus-Photo-1400-79-/370478404439?pt=AU_Computers_Printer_Accessories&hash=item56423bd357)

For accurip, I just go in and change the set up after I send the file to the printer, I got from printer 1 to printer 2. It's the only way I can run 2 printers off accurip.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Artelf2xs on July 13, 2011, 03:00:07 PM
Laser printer ( Brand not important since the Azante head technologie  was reverse engineered) Usually get em for a couple hundred bucks off craigslist, but they last forever.

cartridge cost about $60.00 and last around a year or 20,000 solid  impressions. will print a twelve color file in under three minuets.
Vellum I buy in bulk 32"X36" and have it cut down buy a friend, Cost is about 3 cents a sheet.

NO- RIP SOFTWARE!

Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Frog on July 13, 2011, 03:05:36 PM
Unlike our friend here's excuse of being in the cold pool water, how do you deal with heat related shrinkage and registration issues?

george costanza - i was in the pool (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cUNNKzj_Nc#)
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Artelf2xs on July 13, 2011, 03:14:37 PM
those issues are more myth then fact. Shrinkage I've never had an issue with, I shrink them threw the dryer on purpose because the heat fuzes the toner into a super opaque state.
granted if I need to out put a new film for any reason it will not register, but at like 4 cents each and a few minuets, I just re print the whole job.


Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Frog on July 13, 2011, 03:18:15 PM
So, can I assume that you at least build in a trap, or is your shrinkage consistent enough from color plate to color plate to hold butt registration?
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Artelf2xs on July 13, 2011, 03:44:52 PM
I get perfect Butt to butt., I'll use a choke on my base for the crappy hand press or a gutter trap on a solid white base for the butted colors to fALL INTO.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Frog on July 13, 2011, 03:59:19 PM
George could sure have used you, as I suspect his shrinkage prevented him from achieving perfect butt to butt registration that weekend.  ;D
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Artelf2xs on July 13, 2011, 04:03:45 PM
trust me , I wish I had a image setter, I've had them... But this system keeps us competitive with pricing while offering a better profit.
I've been using it since Adobe© invented the post Script language and have numerous awards with the prints...
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Homer on July 13, 2011, 04:10:49 PM
George could sure have used you, as I suspect his shrinkage prevented him from achieving perfect butt to butt registration that weekend.  ;D

I love your Seinfeld references. . .
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Frog on July 13, 2011, 04:17:39 PM
trust me , I wish I had a image setter, I've had them... But this system keeps us competitive with pricing while offering a better profit.
I've been using it since Adobe© invented the post Script language and have numerous awards with the prints...

Well, Lord knows, I've talked about the  HP 4 mv's and the Canon Engine cousins under two other brand names over the years, and I myself still use a larger Minolta QMS 2060, but the lasers are certainly losing favor.
I know that some of the Xante's advertised some sort of shrinkage compensation, but I don't know what that entailed.

The other knock by dot connoisseurs, is the generally less precise dot shape achieved with laser.

In the end, no one is going to argue with your success though, and, besides, we love a rebel!
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Artelf2xs on July 13, 2011, 04:50:33 PM
Thanks Andy, for touching on that sore spot. You know i suffer from DOT ENVEY ::)

To better Illustrate the problem I have created some 8X10 Glossies for a VINS ( Visual impact on the Nero system.)

You know I stay up some nights worried that my clients will tell me the stunningly beautiful shirts I gave them have come under fire by people viewing them under microscopes and noting that the dots where just not quite as perfect as the shop that charges more for set-ups? :-[
(http://tshirtillustrator.com/images/ripdot.png)

Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Frog on July 13, 2011, 05:03:41 PM

You know I stay up some nights worried that my clients will tell me the stunningly beautiful shirts I gave them have come under fire by people viewing them under microscopes and noting that the dots where just not quite as perfect as the shop that charges more for set-ups? :-[


You mean that you don't "skip to my Loupe, my darling"?
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: DraginInk on July 13, 2011, 05:03:49 PM
I have to say... I like bubbles 8)
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Artelf2xs on July 13, 2011, 06:01:06 PM
WE? who invited you?  ;D

Quote
You mean that you don't "skip to my Loupe, my darling"?

I assume that's some sort of insult? Good thing I'm just too dim witted to figure it out! :0
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Sbrem on July 13, 2011, 06:58:23 PM
trust me , I wish I had a image setter, I've had them... But this system keeps us competitive with pricing while offering a better profit.
I've been using it since Adobe© invented the post Script language and have numerous awards with the prints...

Well, Lord knows, I've talked about the  HP 4 mv's and the Canon Engine cousins under two other brand names over the years, and I myself still use a larger Minolta QMS 2060, but the lasers are certainly losing favor.
I know that some of the Xante's advertised some sort of shrinkage compensation, but I don't know what that entailed.

The other knock by dot connoisseurs, is the generally less precise dot shape achieved with laser.

In the end, no one is going to argue with your success though, and, besides, we love a rebel!

Hi Andy, we have a Xante ScreenWriter 3, though we mostly output through our 1400. On the Xante, they have a special test page for you to print out with various lines and boxes. You print it out, and then, with a ruler with gradations of 1/10th mm, you make measurements from the lines to the edge of the page, and write those numbers into the boxes next to the lines (to help one remember) then open up ScreenWriter software (it's getting fuzzy now, it's been a few years since we had to do it) type the appropriate numbers into the appropriate boxes, and all of your films will register. This has to be done for each size page you print, and for each type of media, vellum or their own translucent film. It works well, and was all we used for quite some time. If you need to produce a single film from a previous file, it will fit the older films.

Steve
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Frog on July 13, 2011, 07:06:28 PM

Quote
You mean that you don't "skip to my Loupe, my darling"?


I assume that's some sort of insult? Good thing I'm just too dim witted to figure it out! :0


Loupe, I say loupe boy, don't you get it? A reference to the magnifier the dot freaks carry around!


(https://www.bintelshop.com.au/Images/Stock/6214X.jpg)

(https://www.bintelshop.com.au/Images/Stock/6879X.jpg)


Watch out for the dot detective!  ;D

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-RCaaWn-Gj2A/Te9k8AvyNvI/AAAAAAAABw0/UZ0417vEFjE/s1600/droopy+with+spyglass.jpg)

I'd say the dot detective has some edge definition issues himself!


Point taken and rectified! Now, no one who is just showing up will know what you meant. lol!
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: ebscreen on July 13, 2011, 07:24:53 PM
I'd say the dot detective has some edge definition issues himself!
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Artelf2xs on July 13, 2011, 07:26:18 PM
I getting old Andy, I thought that was a printer' Loop... Went right over my little knogen Cuz'n I cant's pell!

 I know how to spell Daught toe'n Dan tho.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Dottonedan on July 13, 2011, 08:46:25 PM
Pfftt.   Artelf....has shrinkage issues. :o   Bwahahaha.  ;D Someone was gonna so I did.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: screenxpress on July 13, 2011, 09:15:18 PM
George could sure have used you, as I suspect his shrinkage prevented him from achieving perfect butt to butt registration that weekend.  ;D

I love your Seinfeld references. . .

Well, I had a HP Laserjet4 and 4MV and I DID experience shrinkage frequently.  Using special Laser Film.

And was no cold water around. 

I use Inkjets now.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Catnhat on July 13, 2011, 09:45:29 PM
Epson 1400 with BlackMax & Accurip.  Sharp 2600n with postscript option can be used if the Epson goes down.  And a HP9800 with ghostrip at home for playing around.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Shanarchy on July 14, 2011, 05:20:33 PM
Epson 1400
Epson 3000 (have not started using yet)
Accurip
Fixxon's film
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Homer on July 14, 2011, 05:45:06 PM
My only suggestion is to have a back up printer . Learned that the hard way. . .if you can't produce films, you are sunk.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Shanarchy on July 14, 2011, 08:00:46 PM
My only suggestion is to have a back up printer . Learned that the hard way. . .if you can't produce films, you are sunk.

I think I may start a separate thread about what pieces of "backup" equipment keep in the shop.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: mk162 on July 14, 2011, 09:47:24 PM
good call, start one
Title: emergency Back up print equipment
Post by: Artelf2xs on July 29, 2011, 06:11:38 PM
We keep a Monkey in the closet that is pretty good with some black sharpies. we just have to glue his nose shut or he keeps tweeking on them.  :o
Title: Re: emergency Back up print equipment
Post by: DraginInk on July 31, 2011, 11:47:39 AM
We keep a Monkey in the closet that is pretty good with some black sharpies. we just have to glue his nose shut or he keeps tweeking on them.  :o

Talk about "Old School"... man!
Dude, take it up a notch or ten, give him an opaquing pen.
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Frog on July 31, 2011, 11:53:20 AM
Granted, most monkeys today don't know the difference, but I find that Sharpies and most other standard markers to have a pretty wimpy d-max, and prefer the job-specific offerings from Kimo and Mark-Tex. ;D
Title: Re: Printing films POLL
Post by: Artelf2xs on July 31, 2011, 05:21:34 PM
yea we're saving the Kimo's for the gorillas!